The use of additive technologies in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery

Authors

  1. Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation, Russian Federation
  2. First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, Russian Federation
  3. Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation, Moskva

https://doi.org/10.35571/RMSJ.2019.2.003

Share: VK Telegram By e-mail

Full text

Abstract

Introduction. Modern technologies make it possible not only to plan reconstructive surgery virtually, but also to manufacture templates for resection and osteotomy, customized titanium plates based on the results of planning. Objective. To analyze the results of application of additive technologies for planning and performing reconstructive operations in the Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology Center at Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital Patients and Methods. 144 operations to eliminate different locations bone defects were performed in the Maxillofacial Surgery and Stomatology Center in 2007 - 2017. 136 patients (93%) had de-fects of the bones of the facial skeleton and the skull calvarium. In other cases, there were defects of the clavicle (2 patients), defects of the femur (2 patients), defects of the humerus (2 patients), a defect of the radius (1 patient), a defect of the navicular bone (1 patient). Results. Flaps were used to close the defects in 87% of cases (125 patients), and alloplastic implants were utilized in 13% of cases (19 patients). Additive technologies were used in 85% (n = 123) cases for planning the operation to eliminate defects, as well as for manufacturing surgical models and templates. Clinical cases are considered as examples of the use of the additive technologies for planning and performing reconstructive operations to close bone defects of different locations. The incidence of postoperative complications in the group of patients with facial skeleton and crani-al vault bones defects who underwent surgical interventions using templates was 26%, including minor complications - 17.5%, large - 8.5%. Among minor complications, hematomas (5%) and sup-puration (5%) of the recipient wound prevailed, less often similar complications were hematomas (4%) and suppuration (3%) of the donor wound. Large complications were represented by cases of complete (4%) or partial (5%) transplant necrosis. During surgical interventions without a template, it took significantly longer than the average time of grafting and graft formation (212 ± 18.7 min) than during operations with a template, including with a guide for drilling (136 ± 12.6 min, p <0.001) and without a guide for drilling (160 ± 16.3 min, p <0.001). Conclusion. The use of surgical models and templates during reconstructive operations shortens the time of the operation and reduces the number of postoperative complications.

Keywords

Computer Simulation, Computer-Aided Design, Prototyping, Fibula Transplantation, Free Tissue Flaps, Maxillofacial Surgery, Mandibular Reconstruction methods, Postoperative Complications

Для цитирования:

Терещук С.В., Иванов С.Ю., Корабельников Д.И., Сухарев В.А. Опыт применения аддитивных технологий для реконструктивных операций в челюстно-лицевой хирургии. Российский медико-социальный журнал. 2019;1(2):29-39. https://doi.org/10.35571/RMSJ.2019.2.003

For citation:

Tereshchuk S., Ivanov S., Korabelnikov D., Sukharev V. The use of additive technologies in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. Russian Medical and Social Journal. 2019;1(2):29-39. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.35571/RMSJ.2019.2.003

References

  1. Joskowicz L, Taylor RH. Computers in imaging and guided surgery. Comput Sci Eng. 2001;3(5):65-72. doi https://doi.org/10.1109/5992.947109.
  2. Hanasono MM, Skoracki RJ. Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in mi-crovascular mandible reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(3):597-604. doi https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23717.
  3. Toto JM, Chang EI, Agag R, Devarajan K, Patel SA, Topham NS. Improved operative effi-ciency of free fibula flap mandible reconstruction with patient-specific, computer-guided preopera-tive planning. Head Neck. 2015;37(11):1660-1664. doi https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23815.
  4. Wilde F, Plail M, Riese C, Schramm A, Winter K. Mandible reconstruction with patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates: comparison of a transfer key method to the standard meth-od-results of an in vitro study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012;7(1):57-63. doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-011-0599-8.
  5. Wang JC, Nagy L, Demke JC. Image-guided surgery and craniofacial applications: master-ing the unseen. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;37(1):43. doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0037-x.
  6. ISO / ASTM52900-15, Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing - General Prin-ciples - Terminology. ASTM International. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?ISOASTM52900. Published 2015. Accessed 10.04.2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/ISOASTM52900-15.
  7. Rodby KA, Turin S, Jacobs RJ, Cruz JF, Hassid VJ, Kolokythas A, Antony AK. Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: Systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2014;67(9):1171-1185. doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.038.
  8. Zhuk DM, Perfiliev SA. CAS systems - computer-aided design systems in surgery. Nauka i obrazovanie [Science and education]. 2011. http://technomag.edu.ru/doc/168885.html. Published March 2011. Accessed May 10, 2019. (in Russ.).
  9. Burkey BB, Coleman JR. Current concepts in oromandibular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1997;30(4):607-630. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9233861.
  10. Hidalgo DA, Pusic AL. Free-Flap Mandibular Reconstruction: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):438-449. doi https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200208000-00010.
  11. Robb G. Free-Flap Mandibular Reconstruction: A 10-Year Follow-up Study. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(1):65. doi https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.1.65.
  12. Prisman E, Haerle SK, Irish JC, Daly M, Miles B, Chan H. Value of preoperative mandibular plating in reconstruction of the mandible. Head Neck. 2014;36(6):828-833. doi https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23382.
  13. Haddock NT, Monaco C, Weimer KA, Hirsch DL, Levine JP, Saadeh PB. Increasing Bony Contact and Overlap With Computer-Designed Offset Cuts in Free Fibula Mandible Reconstruc-tion. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(6):1592-1595. doi https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318257576c.
  14. Wong AK, Joanna Nguyen T, Peric M, Shahabi A, Vidar EN, Hwang BH, Niknam Lei-labadi S, Chan LS, Urata MM. Analysis of risk factors associated with microvascular free flap fail-ure using a multi-institutional database. Microsurgery. 2015;35(1):6-12. doi https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.22223.
  15. Sharaf B, Levine JP, Hirsch DL, Bastidas JA, Schiff BA, Garfein ES. Importance of Com-puter-Aided Design and Manufacturing Technology in the Multidisciplinary Approach to Head and Neck Reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(4):1277-1280. doi https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b5d8.

About the authors

  • Sergey Tereshchuk, Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation, Russian Federation

    Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital — Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Center, Head,MD

  • Sergey Ivanov, First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, Russian Federation

    First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov — Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Head of the Department

  • Daniil Korabelnikov, Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation, Moskva, Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation, Moskva, Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation, Moskva

    Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation — Rector

    Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation — Dept of Preventive Medicine, Head,MD

    Haass Moscow Medical and Social Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation — Dept of Internal Diseases, Professor

  • Vladimir Sukharev, Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital, Russian Federation, Russian Federation

    Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital — Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Center, Head,MD

How to Cite

The use of additive technologies in reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. (2019). Russian Medical and Social Journal, 1(2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.35571/RMSJ.2019.2.003
Views: 39 JATS XML

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Russian Medical and Social Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN (Print) 2658-7726 ISSN (Online) 2658-7718